Download Da 2166 9 1 Template

Completing the DA Form 2166-9-1 can be a meticulous process, and mistakes can lead to delays or complications in evaluations. Here are ten common errors individuals make when filling out this important form:

1. Incorrect Personal Information: Failing to accurately enter the name, Social Security Number, or rank can cause significant issues. Ensure that all personal data is correct and matches official records.
2. Missing Dates: Omitting crucial dates, such as the date of rank or the period covered, can lead to confusion. Always double-check that all required dates are filled in completely.
3. Inaccurate Duty Descriptions: Providing vague or incomplete descriptions of daily duties and responsibilities can undermine the evaluation process. Be specific about the scope of duties and areas of emphasis.
4. Failure to Include Required Signatures: Neglecting to obtain signatures from the rater, senior rater, or supplementary reviewer can invalidate the report. Ensure all necessary signatures are present before submission.
5. Omitting Counseling Dates: Forgetting to include the initial and subsequent counseling dates can reflect poorly on the evaluation process. Document all counseling sessions accurately.
6. Incorrect Email Addresses: Providing incorrect or non-government email addresses for raters and reviewers can hinder communication. Always use official .gov or .mil email addresses.
7. Inconsistent Ratings: Making inconsistent assessments between different sections of the evaluation can raise red flags. Ensure that ratings align with the comments provided.
8. Neglecting Comments: Failing to provide comments for performance evaluations, especially for areas marked as "Did Not Meet Standard," can leave the evaluation lacking depth. Always include specific feedback.
9. Ignoring Privacy Act Statements: Overlooking the privacy implications can lead to mishandling sensitive information. Familiarize yourself with the Privacy Act Statement as outlined in AR 623-3.
10. Submitting Without Review: Submitting the form without a thorough review can lead to overlooked errors. Always take the time to review the entire form for accuracy and completeness before submission.

By avoiding these common pitfalls, individuals can ensure that their DA Form 2166-9-1 is completed accurately and effectively, thereby facilitating a smoother evaluation process.

Filling out and using the DA Form 2166-9-1 is essential for evaluating non-commissioned officers. Here are some key takeaways to keep in mind:

• Accuracy is crucial. Ensure all personal information, including name, SSN, and rank, is correct to avoid processing delays.
• Understand the sections. Familiarize yourself with each part of the form, especially the performance evaluation criteria and duty description.
• Review counseling dates. Document initial and subsequent counseling dates accurately. This reflects ongoing communication between the rater and rated NCO.
• Signatures matter. The rated NCO's signature does not indicate agreement with the evaluation but confirms the information is correct.
• Feedback is essential. Provide constructive comments in the evaluation sections. This helps the rated NCO understand strengths and areas for improvement.
• Be aware of the appeals process. The rated NCO should know their rights regarding the appeals process as outlined in AR 623-3.

What is the purpose of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The DA 2166 9 1 form is used to evaluate the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army, specifically for the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation helps in assessing an NCO's skills, attributes, and overall potential for future assignments. It serves as an official record that contributes to promotion decisions, professional development, and career progression within the military.

Who is responsible for completing the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The completion of the DA 2166 9 1 form involves multiple parties. The primary rater, usually the immediate supervisor of the NCO being evaluated, fills out the majority of the form. The senior rater, who is typically a higher-ranking officer, reviews the evaluation and provides additional insights. Lastly, a supplementary reviewer may also be involved in the process to ensure accuracy and fairness in the evaluation.

What information is required in Part I of the DA 2166 9 1 form?

Part I of the DA 2166 9 1 form requires various administrative data about the rated NCO. This includes the NCO's name, Social Security Number or DOD ID, rank, date of rank, and unit information. Additionally, the form asks for the reason for submission, the period covered by the evaluation, and the rated NCO's email address. This section establishes the basic identification and context for the evaluation.

How does the evaluation process work for the DA 2166 9 1 form?

The evaluation process begins with the rater assessing the NCO's performance across various competencies such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement. Each area is rated as either "met" or "did not meet" the standard, accompanied by comments for clarity. After the rater completes their assessment, the senior rater reviews it, providing their own evaluation of the NCO's potential. The rated NCO also signs the form to acknowledge that they have seen the completed report, although their signature does not imply agreement with the evaluations.

What should an NCO do if they disagree with their evaluation on the DA 2166 9 1 form?

If an NCO disagrees with their evaluation, they have the right to appeal the assessment. The appeals process is outlined in AR 623-3. The NCO should first discuss their concerns with their rater or senior rater to seek clarification. If issues remain unresolved, the NCO can formally initiate an appeal following the guidelines provided in the regulation. This process ensures that all evaluations are fair and accurate.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is a crucial document used in the evaluation of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it is often accompanied by various other forms and documents that help provide a comprehensive assessment and maintain accurate records. Below is a list of commonly used forms that complement the DA Form 2166-9-1.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This form serves as the NCO Evaluation Report for the rank of Staff Sergeant (SSG) and higher. It evaluates an NCO's performance and potential, providing a structured format for feedback and assessment.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document is used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It helps track performance issues and developmental goals.
• DA Form 705: This form records the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). It is essential for evaluating physical readiness and overall fitness of soldiers.
• Bill of Sale Form: This essential document facilitates the transfer of ownership for personal property, providing proof of the transaction. For more information, visit californiadocsonline.com/bill-of-sale-form/.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used for recording body fat measurements. They ensure soldiers meet Army weight standards and promote health and fitness.
• DA Form 3349: This form is utilized for medical profiles. It documents any physical limitations a soldier may have, impacting their ability to perform certain duties.
• DA Form 6125: This form is the Army Achievement Medal recommendation. It is used to document achievements that warrant recognition, contributing to a soldier's overall evaluation.
• DA Form 1059: This is the Academic Evaluation Report, which assesses a soldier's performance during military schools or training programs. It highlights educational accomplishments.
• DA Form 7500: This form is used for the Enlisted Record Brief (ERB). It provides a summary of a soldier’s career, including assignments, training, and qualifications.
• DA Form 2-1: This is the Personnel Qualification Record. It contains detailed information about a soldier's qualifications, assignments, and training history.
• DA Form 4187: Known as the Personnel Action Form, it is used to request changes in a soldier’s status, such as promotions, transfers, or reassignments.

Each of these forms plays a vital role in the overall evaluation and management of soldiers within the Army. By using them in conjunction with the DA Form 2166-9-1, leaders can ensure a thorough and accurate assessment of NCO performance and potential. Proper documentation not only supports individual development but also upholds the integrity of military evaluations.